Telecommunication Costs

The modernization of America’s legacy twisted pair copper plant to fiber to the premise (FTTP) has been inhibited – described by observers as “stalled” and “stalemated”– by the conservative, risk averse business models of large investor owned players that require relatively rapid and assured returns on capital investment while also paying generous shareholder dividends. Several years ago, Verizon scaled back its FTTP deployment. In 2016, Google Fiber paused new deployments. AT&T hit the brakes on its FTTP deployments this year at the same time voters and policymakers want to press the gas pedal.

The sluggish progress has prompted localities to seek alternative business models that can more rapidly build FTTP infrastructure serving all and not just some premises along with rising demand for greater reliability and better value. The task isn’t easy. State and local governments and their taxpayers still feel the trauma of the economic crisis a decade ago. They’re thus risk averse when it comes to taking on debt or assessing new taxes. If localities are to build FTTP infrastructure and operations and maintenance, they will have to investigate new financing models that require less public funding.

One that is emerging and bears watching is localities partnering with operators of open access FTTP networks that tap pension funds as a source of patient capital. The 30-50 year lifespan of FTTP telecom infrastructure is far better aligned with the long term investment horizon of pension funds than the shorter timelines of investor owned ISPs. And now that advanced telecommunications is considered an essential utility (but not by legacy telcos and cablecos who prefer it be regarded as an information and entertainment service) and FTTP as a future proof means of delivering it to homes, businesses and institutions, there’s less uncertainty its ability to generate demand and revenue over the long term.

Top Telecommunication Companies In The World

The modernization of America’s legacy twisted pair copper plant to fiber to the premise (FTTP) has been inhibited – described by observers as “stalled” and “stalemated”– by the conservative, risk averse business models of large investor owned players that require relatively rapid and assured returns on capital investment while also paying generous shareholder dividends. Several years ago, Verizon scaled back its FTTP deployment. In 2016, Google Fiber paused new deployments. AT&T hit the brakes on its FTTP deployments this year at the same time voters and policymakers want to press the gas pedal.

The sluggish progress has prompted localities to seek alternative business models that can more rapidly build FTTP infrastructure serving all and not just some premises along with rising demand for greater reliability and better value. The task isn’t easy. State and local governments and their taxpayers still feel the trauma of the economic crisis a decade ago. They’re thus risk averse when it comes to taking on debt or assessing new taxes. If localities are to build FTTP infrastructure and operations and maintenance, they will have to investigate new financing models that require less public funding.

One that is emerging and bears watching is localities partnering with operators of open access FTTP networks that tap pension funds as a source of patient capital. The 30-50 year lifespan of FTTP telecom infrastructure is far better aligned with the long term investment horizon of pension funds than the shorter timelines of investor owned ISPs. And now that advanced telecommunications is considered an essential utility (but not by legacy telcos and cablecos who prefer it be regarded as an information and entertainment service) and FTTP as a future proof means of delivering it to homes, businesses and institutions, there’s less uncertainty its ability to generate demand and revenue over the long term.

Top Telecommunication Companies In The World

Best Telecommunication Companies

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, I grew fascinated by the rapid evolution of personal computing and telecommunications and particularly their ability to virtually shrink time and distance. This is a society-altering trend that improves the quality of lives for millions as well as the environment by reducing transportation demand. 

In a world of digital communications, knowledge workers can interact with employers, colleagues and clients regardless of location. However, in much of the United States, the so-called "last mile" telecommunications infrastructure that brings advanced digital services to homes and small businesses is incomplete, inadequate and overly reliant on copper wire designed for a bygone era of analog "plain old telephone" service. 

Former U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski has described the build out of modern, digital telecommunications infrastructure to serve nearly all Americans no matter where they make their homes and businesses as the "critical infrastructure challenge of our generation." This blog is dedicated to the exploration of strategies and methods to meet this challenge.

Security Service Networking

Each department throughout an organization (IT, sales, finance, legal, marketing, HR, etc.) needs to come together and discuss their common enemy, which is none other than evolving cyber threats and cyber criminals. This can only be done when the organizations cyber security posture is treated in a systemic way, by identifying the gaps and risks across the whole business. If necessary, consult an external cyber security expert who will review the organizations cyber risk profile and assist the decision maker to understand where they are standing. In some cases, this discussion starts with reviewing the results of a cyber security awareness assessment, that leads to proper training, and then breaks down to the specific needs of each department participating the review process.

Devise a plan: By hypothesizing attack scenarios, develop a good idea on what is exposed, what particular type of attacks can affect the organization, security service  which are high value targets, what kind of vulnerabilities are present and assess the impact in each scenario. This process not only sets the foundation for constructing a proper response plan, but also determines the recovery process within an acceptable time frame for the business. Furthermore, this process highlights any hidden weak points, vulnerabilities that slipped through the cracks and most importantly what needs to be reviewed further. At this stage, engaging with an expert third-party allows for a faster, better, efficient and effective adaptation to emerging cyber threats, dramatically reducing the risk of being targeted or even breached.

Mitigation Strategy: It is not possible to know for sure or predict emerging cyber threats and the effect that will have to the business (e.g. lost revenue, reputational harm, stock price). Having rough estimates provides a far more realistic idea to what is at stake, the consequences of unrealistic expectations, and up to what level risk should be considered acceptable. The outcome at this stage will further assist when it comes to deciding the right cyber insurance coverage. In the meantime, the mitigation strategy will involve all the necessary steps to determine what is the greatest threat depending the particular nature of the organisation, up to what level it can be mitigated and how, and what specific investments are needed in order to avoid unnecessary future costs.

Security Connection

Each department throughout an organization (IT, sales, finance, legal, marketing, HR, etc.) needs to come together and discuss their common enemy, which is none other than evolving cyber threats and cyber criminals. This can only be done when the organizations cyber security posture is treated in a systemic way, by identifying the gaps and risks across the whole business. If necessary, consult an external cyber security expert who will review the organizations cyber risk profile and assist the decision maker to understand where they are standing. In some cases, this discussion starts with reviewing the results of a cyber security awareness assessment, that leads to proper training, and then breaks down to the specific needs of each department participating the review process.

Devise a plan: By hypothesizing attack scenarios, develop a good idea on what is exposed, what particular type of attacks can affect the organization, security service  which are high value targets, what kind of vulnerabilities are present and assess the impact in each scenario. This process not only sets the foundation for constructing a proper response plan, but also determines the recovery process within an acceptable time frame for the business. Furthermore, this process highlights any hidden weak points, vulnerabilities that slipped through the cracks and most importantly what needs to be reviewed further. At this stage, engaging with an expert third-party allows for a faster, better, efficient and effective adaptation to emerging cyber threats, dramatically reducing the risk of being targeted or even breached.

Mitigation Strategy: It is not possible to know for sure or predict emerging cyber threats and the effect that will have to the business (e.g. lost revenue, reputational harm, stock price). Having rough estimates provides a far more realistic idea to what is at stake, the consequences of unrealistic expectations, and up to what level risk should be considered acceptable. The outcome at this stage will further assist when it comes to deciding the right cyber insurance coverage. In the meantime, the mitigation strategy will involve all the necessary steps to determine what is the greatest threat depending the particular nature of the organisation, up to what level it can be mitigated and how, and what specific investments are needed in order to avoid unnecessary future costs.

Information Technology Security Solutions

Before you actually invest in a security camera system, you need to think about what you'll be watching and what you need in order to watch it. 

The number of cameras you want is probably the first question that should come to mind. Are you focusing on one room in the house, or do you need to keep an eye on several different parts of the house? Will you need to monitor outdoor activity as well as indoor? If you're simply watching over one room, you'll probably need just one camera, but including more areas requires a bigger camera system.

Security cameras are either wired or wireless, and which setup you'll need depends on where you'll want to put the cameras and how visible you want them to be. Wired cameras might be trickier to install, and stray wires can hamper your attempts to be discreet. 

They do, however, have a typically higher-quality picture than wireless cameras, Security IT since their signals aren't travelling through the air.

Wireless cameras have more flexibility, but broadcasts from other devices such as wireless Internet, cordless phones and baby monitors -- can interrupt a wireless camera's signal. Also, keep in mind that if you decide on a wireless system, there's a possibility your video feeds could be intercepted by others. Having someone else monitor your activity around the house or finding out whether or not you're at home defeats the purpose of having security cameras. If you're worried about your personal security, you can check with the manufacturer to see whether or not they encrypt their wireless system.